Hubert Dreyfus himself contributes to the discussion on Stanley Fish's blog at the New York Times. The philosopher who famously marked the limits of artificial intelligence forty years ago observes that computers still lag humans in understanding contexts.
And human beginners are capable of understanding the position below (recycled yet again!) far better than the best chess computer programs.
Here's another example from the 2006 World Computer Championship: check out Black's horrible 71st move, a move that no human master would ever allow.
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
Monday, February 28, 2011
Yet another silly Internet game
This game has an unusual concluding move. Equally good was 17.Nh6! - but no points for 17.Nxd8?, which would have let Black play on for a few moves.
Another game from the DRW-AMARS match
Steve Goredetskiy and Rob Eaman finished just after Hayhurst-Brock was agreed drawn, and the match was drawn 3-3....but not for want of trying on both sides!
Blood on the board, redux
On my way to last Tuesday's Chicago Industrial Chess League match (DRW Trading Group vs. the AMA Rogue Squadron), I was carelessly crossing Wacker Drive (under construction) while checking my iPhone for DRW's address. Just south of the Lyric Opera on Madison, I tripped on the curb and hit the sidewalk hard. It was fortunate that I only bloodied an elbow and not my noggin.
When I told my wise wife that I'd tripped, she said that I needed to spend more time in the real world. I strategically "forgot" to confess the part about not looking where I was going. Fortunately for me, she does not read this blog.
The hospitable folks at DRW help me dress my wound and had Lou Malnati's pizza waiting for us. My clumsiness carried over to the game. After I made my 23rd move, I realized I'd dug a strange little trap for myself, which Lyle Hayhurst of DRW quickly found. The tactic is memorable for being an immediate killer that takes several moves to come to fruition--is that a contradiction?
I sacked a piece in desperation, after which the cool 30.Ng5! would have won immediately. The ending after 41.Nxd2 should also be won for White, but it's nontrivial. Your computer will mislead you if you don't have a tablebase installed: remember that king plus bishop plus rook pawn of the wrong color vs. king is a draw. But if Black sacks the knight for White's g3 pawn, White can blockade the pawns, win them, and then win the KBN vs. K ending (not as hard as it sounds). One idea for White, therefore, is to play h4-h5 an an opportune moment. However undeservedly, I escaped with a draw.
In other February 2011 blood-on-the-chess-board-in-Chicagoland news, NM Pete Karagianis led a his students into battle at the U.S. Amateur Team North. One of his young teammates lost a tooth, and Pete had to render first aid during play.
P.S. White still had a win as late as move 71. Can you find it?
When I told my wise wife that I'd tripped, she said that I needed to spend more time in the real world. I strategically "forgot" to confess the part about not looking where I was going. Fortunately for me, she does not read this blog.
The hospitable folks at DRW help me dress my wound and had Lou Malnati's pizza waiting for us. My clumsiness carried over to the game. After I made my 23rd move, I realized I'd dug a strange little trap for myself, which Lyle Hayhurst of DRW quickly found. The tactic is memorable for being an immediate killer that takes several moves to come to fruition--is that a contradiction?
I sacked a piece in desperation, after which the cool 30.Ng5! would have won immediately. The ending after 41.Nxd2 should also be won for White, but it's nontrivial. Your computer will mislead you if you don't have a tablebase installed: remember that king plus bishop plus rook pawn of the wrong color vs. king is a draw. But if Black sacks the knight for White's g3 pawn, White can blockade the pawns, win them, and then win the KBN vs. K ending (not as hard as it sounds). One idea for White, therefore, is to play h4-h5 an an opportune moment. However undeservedly, I escaped with a draw.
In other February 2011 blood-on-the-chess-board-in-Chicagoland news, NM Pete Karagianis led a his students into battle at the U.S. Amateur Team North. One of his young teammates lost a tooth, and Pete had to render first aid during play.
P.S. White still had a win as late as move 71. Can you find it?
After 70...g5
White to play and win
Former USCF President Harold Winston, Chairman/CEO of the U.S. Chess Trust
You can read a bit about Harold here. His office is a few blocks away from my office.....
And you can donate to the U.S. Chess Trust here! It's a 501(c)(3) organization, and money donated to the Trust goes to good use!
March 5: $5 event at Evanston Chess
Yet another email cut-and-paste:
Levy Senior Center, 300 Dodge Ave, Evanston, IL 60202
Evanston Chess Presents:
Mar 05, 2011, 9:00am-5:00pm
Three x Three
3SS G/65
Three Sections, USCF Regular Rated
Section Gold: 1700 and over
Section Silver: 1200 - 1699
Section Bronze: Under 1200 and Unrated
1600 - 1699 may play up to Gold.
1100 - 1199 may play up to Silver.
Published USCF Regular Rating determins eligibility.
Unrated players may be placed up at TD discretion.
From time to time Evanston Chess pays one or more titled players to play in our events. We usually do not pair them against each other. Even if they should lose (it does happen) we may pair them with the highest score groups.
Three rounds. Digital clocks are required and will be set to G/65 plus 5 seconds delay. Accelerated or decelerated pairings at TD discretion. Sections may be combined at TD discretion.
Registration from 9:00 to 9:30 AM. Players must check in by 9:30 am; players who arrive late will receive a half-point bye for the first round. First Round 9:45 am, last round over roughly 5:00 pm. No Lunch Break: We need to be finished by 5:00 PM, so there will be no extra time between rounds for lunch.
You may take one half-point bye in any round but the last.
Entry fee is $5, please pay cash (no checks) at the door. Masters and Experts play free.
Send name, USCF number, and telephone number to enter@evanstonchess.org
Junior players (under fourteen years) rated 900+ are welcome. Sorry, but we do not accept junior players rated under 900. Must be accompanied by a parent throughout the event.
Bring clocks. -- Wheelchair accessible. No Smoking.
Thursday, February 24, 2011
Jeopardy, Fischer, anthropology, phone-a-friend
Random links....
Stanley Fish discusses Hubert Dreyfus's critique of AI. And Kasparov opines...
Sevan Muradian told me that Robert R. Desjarlais's Counterplay: An Anthropologist at the Chessboard
looks like interesting reading.
Garry Kasparov reviews Frank Brady's Endgame
. Mig discusses that review, too.
And guess who was on the Georgian version of Who Wants to Be A Millionaire?
Stanley Fish discusses Hubert Dreyfus's critique of AI. And Kasparov opines...
White to play
Can you evaluate this position more accurately than Rybka?
If so, why?
Sevan Muradian told me that Robert R. Desjarlais's Counterplay: An Anthropologist at the Chessboard
Garry Kasparov reviews Frank Brady's Endgame
And guess who was on the Georgian version of Who Wants to Be A Millionaire?
2011 Warren Scholars announced
Warren Junior Program director Andi Rosen (who's been busy this week!) announces the 2011 awards on the ICA website.
First Illinois Elementary School Association championship results!
Mike Zacate reports at the Illinois Chess Association website!
Forty-three teams at the U.S. Cellular Coliseum in Bloomington
U.S. Amateur Team North results!
Andi Rosen reports at Chess Life Online.
The uchicago.edu team finished 2nd on tiebreaks
Next year, why not "Straight outta Quadrangle"?
Here's the list of prizewinners and here are the MSA results by player.
Beginners' trap?
Local Class A player Dean Arond plays many objectively dubious openings. But he knows them very well, he has fun playing these sharp lines, and more than one master has fallen into his snare. In the following game, Dean equalizes against Whitney Young's Sam Schmakel with an opening best known as a beginners' trap.
White to play
Sam Schmakel-Dean Arond, Skokie 2011
I thought the ending was interesting, too! You can play through the game on the interactive board below:
Wednesday, February 23, 2011
Monday, February 21, 2011
Sunday, February 20, 2011
"Secrets of a Mind-Gamer"
Essential reading: the section on techniques for breaking through plateaus is of particular interest to chess players.
Santarius wins Blitz, Angelo Young wins title
NM Erik Santarius won the ICA Blitz Championship with an excellent 9-1 score against very tough competition. As Erik is a Wisconsin resident, the second-place finisher, IM Angelo Young, adds the title of 2011 Illinois Blitz Champion to his five "slow" titles. Anglelo scored 7½-2½. Two-time US Game/30 champion Michael Auger, NM Eric Rosen, NM Atulya Shetty, and Matthew Wilber tied for third with 7-3.
NM Gopal Menon, who's one of the strongest "bullet" (one-minute game) players on the Internet Chess Club, didn't win a prize this year, nor did NMs Stamnov or Karagianis.
Results are here!
NM Gopal Menon, who's one of the strongest "bullet" (one-minute game) players on the Internet Chess Club, didn't win a prize this year, nor did NMs Stamnov or Karagianis.
Results are here!
Frank Brady on CSPAN2 tonight
Mr. Brady will be discussing Endgame
at 7:15 Central Time. The interview is about 40 minutes. (Hat tip to Ken Marshall for the heads-up.)
1001 Deadly Checkmates
I recently got John Nunn's new book 1001 Deadly Checkmates
. It's a collection of (you guessed it) 1001 positions from actual play (mostly in the last few years) where the player on move can checkmate by force in a few moves. It is a great book, which I think will be useful to a wide range of players, say from 1400 to 2400. I'm 2200 OTB and can solve most of the problems pretty quickly (197 out of the first 200), but still find them useful for honing my tactical skills. They should be even more useful for lower-rated players, who will find a lot of mating ideas that are new to them. Chess is largely a matter of pattern recognition, so exercises like these are useful to everyone. It's reasonably priced, too - only $15.75 at Amazon.com.
Here is a position, from Kotrotsos-Stiri, Iraklion 2005 (No. 640 in Nunn's book) that surprised me. I solved it quickly enough, but might not have if I hadn't known that there was a mate to be found. White, on move, must force mate.
Here is a position, from Kotrotsos-Stiri, Iraklion 2005 (No. 640 in Nunn's book) that surprised me. I solved it quickly enough, but might not have if I hadn't known that there was a mate to be found. White, on move, must force mate.
A trap in the Slav
This trap is similar to several others where a player plays B-KN5 (i.e. Bg5 or Bg4, depending on color), then follows it up with P-K3 (e3 or e6), allowing the opponent to win the unprotected bishop with Q-R4+ (Qa5+ or Qa4+). These include (a) the notorious 1.d4 Nf6 2.Bg5 c6 3.e3?? Qa5+ 0-1, Z. Đorđević-M. Kovačević, Bela Crkva 1984; (b) 1.Nf3 d5 2.g3 c6 3.Bg2 Bg4 4.c4 e6 5.cxd5 cxd5?? 6.Qa4+ Bachler-Van Meter, Midwest Masters 1985; and (c) 1.g4? d5 2.Bg2 Bxg4 3.c4 c6 4.Qb3 e6 5.cxd5 cxd5?? 6.Qa4+ Van der Heijden-Van Ranwooy, Walwijk 1978. These games offer further evidence for GM John Nunn's "LPDO" (Loose Pieces Drop Off) principle.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


